The use of fixed fees in energy network tariffs is impeding a just energy transition in Europe by promoting higher electricity consumption and disproportionately disadvantaging low-income households, says the not-for-profit Regulatory Assistance Project (RAP).

Consumers pay for energy distribution infrastructure through network tariffs made up of fixed and use-based fees. When fixed fees dominate a tariff, low-use consumers – used in the report as a proxy for low-income households – pay proportionately more for their network use than high-use consumers, the report states.
How well do you really know your competitors?
Access the most comprehensive Company Profiles on the market, powered by GlobalData. Save hours of research. Gain competitive edge.

Thank you!
Your download email will arrive shortly
Not ready to buy yet? Download a free sample
We are confident about the unique quality of our Company Profiles. However, we want you to make the most beneficial decision for your business, so we offer a free sample that you can download by submitting the below form
By GlobalDataConversely, a use-based network fee (€/kWh) distributes network costs based on energy use, which the report considers more equitable.
In Germany, under a uniform fixed-fee tariff, low-use consumers can pay up to 2.5 times more for network costs per unit of energy delivered than high-use consumers.
Worryingly, given this conclusion, there is an increasing trend towards fixed fees for residential consumers. Germany, Spain and Italy have all implemented such payment structures.
The inequitable distribution of costs could lead to disenfranchisement and social unrest, ultimately slowing the energy transition, the report warns.