Receive our newsletter – data, insights and analysis delivered to you
  1. Tech
  2. Renewables
17 May 2021

Weekly data: Why keeping an eye on copper is vital for the energy transition

Copper is a critical component in the cables needed to decarbonise energy systems, but experts differ on the relationship between the race for renewables and mineral mining.

By Mirela Petkova

It takes a lot of copper to plug in an offshore wind turbine – around 8,000kg per megawatt (MW). Analysis by the International Energy Agency (IEA) suggests the wind industry is the most copper-intensive renewable power technology sector. An average turbine of 3.6MW, which can power more than 3,300 average EU households, will contain close to 29 tonnes (t) of copper.

The main reason for this heavy use of copper is the cables, which enable electricity from the turbines to be transmitted to the power grid.

As the roll-out of wind power increases and turbines get bigger, demand for copper will also shoot up. For reference, today’s global offshore wind capacity stands at 34GW. This figure is expected to pass 230GW by 2030, says the Global Wind Energy Council, a staggering increase of at least 570% in ten years. At the same time, as of May 2021, the copper price soared to an all-time high of $10,440/t (€8,607.82).

Workers of the Next Mineral mining company inspect the Comahue copper mine in Antofagasta, Chile, in March 2021. (Photo by GLENN ARCOS/AFP via Getty Images)

Whether there is enough copper to go round for all industries remains to be seen, but Energy Monitor’s weekly data shows how consultant KPMG believes clean energy production will only have used 2% of global copper assets by mid-century compared with known reserves in 2020.

Content from our partners
Reimagining the carbon problem
How investing in Scotland can help to drive a low-carbon future
Beyond smart: How the grid-interactive building will form an essential component of the new energy system

Reacting to the IEA report, Kingsmill Bond, energy strategist for Carbon Tracker, a UK think tank, accepts the mineral assets needed to build renewable technologies are higher than those required for fossil fuels.

However, he believes this is a narrow way of looking at the issue. “They [IEA analysts] look only at the stocks (the assets you need to build the generator or car) not the flows (the energy you need to run them),” he writes.

In addition, the demand for critical minerals that would be needed to build out the amount of renewable energy to keep global warming below 1.5°C is still 300 times less than current demand for fossil fuels mined out of the earth, says Bond. Put simply, the advantages of renewable energy outweigh by far the disadvantages that come with mining the minerals and rare earths needed to produce it, he argues.

Topics in this article: , ,
NEWSLETTER Sign up Tick the boxes of the newsletters you would like to receive. Switch on the week and Switch it off again with our round-up, sent Mondays and Fridays
I consent to GlobalData UK Limited collecting my details provided via this form in accordance with the Privacy Policy
SUBSCRIBED

THANK YOU